sharco
![](images/star2.gif) ![](images/star2.gif) ![](images/star2.gif) ![](images/star2.gif)
发贴: 2185
|
2005-02-21 10:08
![收藏这篇帖子](http://abbs.cn/images/icons/icon_favorite.gif)
HC2O wrote: 1,所提到的program, event是特指barbican中心内所举行的event和其内在的program。下面图解是对其program和event的mapping。Tschumi作品当然有读。
![](http://abbs.cn/pic/2005/02/19/1108758668.jpg)
2,Tracing是一种很常见的technique。如何tracing很重要,但更重要的是如何运用tracing得到的结果。 3,没有context, 不能判断schindler那句话的意思。 4,MVRDV在不同时期,在不同的project都有不同的所谓的“research”。Berlarge里的Winy MASS和实践中的Winy MASS也有着很大的不同。MVRDV当然有读。 5,不知道“digital/computational architecture” 指的是什么,sharco是否认为HC2O的设计是“digital/computational architecture”? 设计行为不可能不涉及“designer's perceptual and cognitive abilities”吧。Research和design的关系如下图解所示。
![](http://abbs.cn/pic/2005/02/19/1108758730.jpg)
1, Tschumi ask this kinda questions in his book Architecture and Disjunction: can we cook in bedroom and make love in Kitchen? is the relationship between the space and event one to one? The diagram seems to install some kinda one to one relationship, if I didn't misunderstand. 2, Tracing, for me, means the space dosen't pre-exist before the movement. What we trace no matter what kinda method we use is the boundary or surface of the movement. Why we have to do this? 3, Schindler is making fun of Corbusier. Architects are not engineers. Architecture is beyond building. I prefer somebody's summary showed belew: Creative Design Process Alpha science: subjective world of beauty and moral, as expressed by the artistic intuitive soul; Beta science: objective world of facts and logic, represented by the rational mind; Gama science: interest of the society and culture. 4, so what makes MVRDV's work an actualization of their research instead of superimpose some theoretical frame on top of a common design? 5, Here's the point, if the design process could not independent from the designer's perceptual and cognitive abilities, what's the value of "research design"? Could it help a second year student to create a space as meaningful as Rem or Zaha? If yes, how?, if not, why? Thanks for your time and patience.
|