我去年参加这个STUDIO, 老师是法国来的,同时在AA当老师.风格和其他5个STUDIO不同.有点想荷兰的BERLAGE (好象是这么拼,懒得查了) 比较注意研究分析, process, diagram. 经常问的问题是: who use the building? how do it work? where is the funds from? why do you do this function? why is this shape? 等等...........
对建筑设计本身不是很重视. 他们经常说Architecture is not the final result. 优点:很逻辑,要考虑很多.很注意DIAGRAM, 图面效果很COOL 缺点:不重视建筑设计.做建筑设计的时间不多.老师比较少辅导这方面.
Poetics of Development and Urban Transformations within the Post-Industrial Condition Doina Petrescu, Aidan Hoggard and visiting specialists max 18 students Studio 2 is in transition: We will focus this year on phenomena of transition and the transformations of the socio-political and economic structures in two post-industrial cities located in both Eastern and Western Europe. The architecture of transition is not simply associated with building but partakes in a geopolitical strategy and a socio-economic process, which deals with a wider concept of space and spatiality. In the context of the European transition, the local transformations are explicitly connected to trans-nationally scaled dynamics through political and economic mechanisms. Within this process, architecture is not only a final product but also a tactical instrument in creating socio-economic dynamics within evolving conditions.
We are interested in how the project of architecture can interpret, initiate and assist the transformations of communities, spaces and institutions within a situation of transition. What are the new paradigms of the project? What is its role in creating socio-political and economic dynamics? How does the condition of transition generate redefinitions within the field of architecture and architectural practice?