unicorn
![](images/star2.gif) ![](images/star2.gif)
发贴: 209
|
2006-03-13 06:11
![收藏这篇帖子](http://abbs.cn/images/icons/icon_favorite.gif)
arch_milan wrote: 谢谢unicorn的建议,我会考虑的。 感觉话题涉及到中外建筑学教育的问题了。希望有看法和建议的朋友们可以继续给我一点帮助。 但是请问unicorn大师,你所说的:之前的professional education很重要和 you also推荐后者,是否是矛盾的呢?
please don't call me "unicorn大师". It definitly make me uncomfortable. I just a common one as most people, except some more experiences.
the 3-3.5 M.Arch program is a professional education. and it is enough make you to be a very good architect.
by the way, it looks like there are only 27 universities have B.Arch program which can be seen as a Chinese professional education. But it compare with US, UK or other europe's program. I don't think it is really professional. the program those out of the 27 by some means can been seen as waste time. because they have spend extra time to get their first professiona degree or get a quality to take the examination of license. but even that, they also could have a bright future, if they work hard for their aims. the way to be a architect is really hard. you should seriously think about your choice and do you really love to be a architect or just like architecture.
unicorn edited on 2006-03-13 09:28
|